“Gin-drinking is a great vice in England, but
wretchedness and dirt are a greater; and until you improve the homes of the
poor, or persuade a half-famished wretch not to seek relief in the temporary
oblivion of his own misery, with the pittance which, divided among his family,
would furnish a morsel of bread for each, gin-shops will increase in number and
splendor.”
Dickens’ argument is that in order to end the
drinking problem, society needs to stop the source of the misery. With cleaner streets and better housing conditions,
people living in the “slums” would not spread sicknesses as often, young
children would not die, and fathers or mothers would not consider drinking away
their problems when they have families to take care of. Essentially, these “peasants” go to the gin
shops in order to escape reality, which oftentimes is too horrible for them to
face. They do not have anything to look
forward to when they go home, except for filth and misery. Something as eye-opening as this short sketch published in a newspaper would probably have elicited some sort of reform or at least an investigation into the truths of Dickens' descriptions.